Is this some old conspiracy theory resurfacing?

Posted by Calm_Caterpillar_166

10 Comments

  1. Old as in it’s been known about for a long time, sure. But I don’t think it ever really died. Kinda just got buried by the more polarizing political stuff on here. I see it mentioned at least once a year I’d say, but I can’t speak on whether it always gains traction.

  2. they definitely did something to him for this movie, possibly the use of the heart attack gun the cia made.

  3. SuperSaltyMan25 on

    It’s had a major resurgence. The crazy thing is people on the Kubrick sub say it has no connection, which I find absolutely baffling, especially as someone who has studied the film.

  4. TheBestintheWest11 on

    meh. Why didn’t something happen to him while the movie was being made why wait till after? doesn’t make sense.

  5. Agreeable-Cold4794 on

    They own Hollywood. IF it was a real issue, they wouldn’t have released the film at all… Any common sense in this sub?

Leave A Reply