Does anyone else feel like it’s a “false flag” type of opportunistic attack since the government is struggling to find reasoning for attacking Iran?

Posted by Loser_withan_iPhone

27 Comments

  1. Honestly no. Because if they did it there would have been multiple fatalities

    Edit: by they I mean Israel

  2. andrewbenedict on

    Struggling to find reasoning for attacking Iran? I mean it’s obviously because we need to keep them from developing nukes. Whether you believe that or not, that is the official narrative that is constantly repeated.

  3. These_Finding6937 on

    One guy looks like a homeless pothead and the other looks like a model for America’s Got Arabs.

    I don’t see either possessing WMDs.

  4. SuperNovaScotian on

    I just want to say I watched this live on BG on the scene, it really wasn’t that dramatic and it seemed very obviously like a planned bit. Weird how the media/bots etc are now making this some weird event

  5. A lot of failed attacks lately, which is honestly more weird that none have been successful.

  6. X_Ego_Is_The_Enemy_X on

    Leftists: when it’s leftists it’s a false flag, and when it’s right wingers, they are Nazis.

  7. Pitiful-Excitement47 on

    WMD is a stretch. They threw homemade explosives. Videos from dozens of angles during a protest.

    Not a fasle flag, as it would of actually detonated if it was.

    Simply mentally ill individuals who’s going to spend a long time behind bars.

  8. toppestsigma on

    These are just npcs thinking their action would matter.

    *they* already said so their reason for attacking iran

  9. Anyone ever cringe and just want to yell shut the fk up when you hear allah ahkbar fuckin on repeat lmao

  10. Feeling_Window308 on

    These are buffers, seeing how far they can get before getting caught. Imagine there is 100,000 people right now plotting this type of stuff. Might catch a few but not all. Buckle up everyone, only a matter of time before we get a false flag bomb attack, mass shooting, u.s.a. govt will claim iran or Pakistan etc… and boom, legit ww3 starts.

  11. Pretty sure they were IEDs and not WMDs, although IMO IED is still stretching the definition of what this was. In a literal sense they apparently were “improvised explosive devices,” but clearly nowhere near as destructive as what we saw in Iraq

Leave A Reply