Submission Statement:
Is a “habitual user” of a legal state substance (marijuana) “dangerous” enough to lose their constitutional rights? The government’s argument in Hemani suggests that the mere status of being a drug user is enough for categorical disarmament. This video breaks down how the DOJ is trying to use 19th-century “drunkard” laws to justify modern-day infringements on the 2nd Amendment.
1 Comment
Submission Statement:
Is a “habitual user” of a legal state substance (marijuana) “dangerous” enough to lose their constitutional rights? The government’s argument in Hemani suggests that the mere status of being a drug user is enough for categorical disarmament. This video breaks down how the DOJ is trying to use 19th-century “drunkard” laws to justify modern-day infringements on the 2nd Amendment.