I just saw a post about rich politicians buying bunkers and it reminded me of this… I don't think the ballroom is just a ballroom. I think it's about renovating and reinforcing the bunker that lied under the wing they just knocked down.

Trump knocking half of the Whitehouse down for a vanity project is so plausible nobody is questioning it. However, do you really think important people in DC wouldn't give him pushback for it?

Also, it's not even scheduled to finish before he leaves office, since when does this man do ANYTHING for anybody but himself? A ballroom he won't even use? Or, a bunker set to finish before that, because that's priority #1.

We are overdue for a revamping because the old one was built during the Soviet threat iirc.

Trump is a little wuss who likes to pop his mouth off at global leaders and start petty wars, of COURSE he wants somewhere to go hide.

But here's the smoking gun, look at the "donors" of the "ballroom." It's largely tech companies, communication companies, and defense contractors. Why would these companies be interested in a ballroom? Surface explaination they're just cozying up to Trump. Deeper explaination — because they're getting something out of it, they're getting contracts to help with the development of the bunker.

Posted by OpheliaPhoeniXXX

5 Comments

  1. It’ll be the one consolation when Israel finally sets the world’s nukes off, that all that club are together in bunkers for years. I wouldn’t like like to share a bunker with any single one of them for even a few days. Let them turn on each other like the troglodytes they deserve to be.

Leave A Reply