-
This number is not true. It's more like 12-15%
-
"White" is not a biological category. It's a societal concept that groups unrelated demographics together because of shared amount of melanin in Thier skin while excluding similar groups. e.g Russians and Italians are both considered the same race despite being unrelated while Italians and Libyans are not despite being genetically much closer
-
12-15% seems like a very small number untill you see every other "race" as well. Black people are 15-18%, East Asians are ~20%, South Asians are also ~20%, these are major groups, then there are much smaller groups like Turkic with less than 2.5%, indigenous Americans with less than 1% and native Australians being much lower. Every racial group is a minority if you look at it In a vacuum.
-
Just because other continents with different climates exist, which leads people to have a different skin color, doesn't mean that you can be racist.
-
"White population used to be 33%" It was never 33%. There is no source or proof of that.
-
"White birthrates are being reduced on purpose" This is not true as birth rates have consistently been declining across the globe. Most east Asian countries are already below the replacement level of 2.1, like, china at 1.3 and south Korea at 0.6. Same with other Asian, African, Arab and LATAM countries, Iran is at 1.6, turkey at 1.5, Tunisia at 1.9 and Saudi Arabia at 2.1, most of them are around 2.1 which is a steep decline from 20 or so years ago and it's going to decline further. It's just that sub-replacement level birth rates are an inevitable point in the development of a society.It's that Europe hit that point earlier and the rest of the world is following it now. Even in western nations, 2nd generation immigrants have the same birthrates as the native population
-
"White culture is being erased" No it's not. For example, US had British culture since it's beginning and it has had massive waves of migration from all over the world, from Italy, Germany, china, mexico and African nations. They all assimilated into the greater American culture at the end of the day. Same will happen today. If a person immigrates to the US today, he might have a different culture. But, his grand children will be very much assimilated into the American culture.
-
"It's about the culture" Then, why do you hate people from Latin America and Africa who speak a European language (Spanish, Portuguese, french, English), follow Christianity and have the same values that were enforced on to them by European colonialism
If anyone has another argument to defend this theory. Let me know
Posted by julius-ceaser100
8 Comments
Is great replacement even worth engaging with?
The people that would be convinced by any of the above already don’t believe in great replacement
You can’t reason someone out of a position they didn’t reason themselves into. White replacement theory is entirely just white fear and anxiety from seeing a Indian family move next door. Not literally just that, but its an emotional reaction that they rationalize after the fact with conspiracies. Debunking it is pointless, you have to address the emotional roots
Also, in the UK, Enoch Powell said Black Caribbean immigrants would never integrate because they looked “too different”. In 2009, it was found nearly half of Black Caribbean people in the UK who married, married white British. Now there are 3 times as many Mixed (white – Black Caribbean) children as Black Caribbean children. Mixed (white – Black Caribbean) is the largest Mixed group in the UK. In 2021, it was found mixed-race people were the fastest growing demographic.
Copying my comment from one of my posts
France has the highest rate of ethnic assimilation of non-white ethnic minorities in Europe and is far ahead in the ethnic assimilation of Muslim minorities compared to other European countries.
“While the intimate partner of 73% of immigrants who have such a partner in France is either an immigrant themselves or the French-born child of immigrants, only 34% of the second generation are in a union with a person of immigrant origin. And only 61% of that 34% are in a union with someone from precisely the same country of origin as themselves. Altogether, then, 79% of members of the second generation are in a union with someone of a different geographic origin; that is, in an ethnically mixed union. Even among people of African descent, the majority of unions are mixed (57% for those originally from the Maghreb or the Sahel).”
Suggesting only 20% of people born in France to immigrant parents are in a union with someone of the same ethnicity.
Also, 35-44% of French-Maghreb born in France to immigrant parents are married to white French (35% for women, 45% for men).
Actually, France has an even higher white-PoC marriage rate than the US, too, even if you compared with Hispanic/Asian and white interracial rates in the US.
Plus, according to some statistics, there’s suggestions that the majority of people born in France to parents from West or Central Africa marry white French.
[https://www.ined.fr/en/everything_about_population/demographic-facts-sheets/faq/is-it-true-that-the-ethnic-mix-of-unions-is-increasing](https://www.ined.fr/en/everything_about_population/demographic-facts-sheets/faq/is-it-true-that-the-ethnic-mix-of-unions-is-increasing)
IDK about north Africans and Arabs, they’ve been considered White by the US census until very recently.
Ironically enough, the people who believe in this crap are pretty replaceable themselves.