Hello to everyone. Lately I am thinking too much about how this "science" is keeping us trapped in a cave of ignorance.

We are at the peak of human evolution, but the truth is we are being passively controlled, made dependent, delicate, and defenseless. And the world governments do the impossible to hide the ET sightings and testimonies because if we understood the truth we would be impossible to govern.

Neil deGrasse Tyson is the biggest agent of this psychological control. He is like the public relations guy for the system.

His job is to sell you a linear narrative: we are born, we work for the system, then one day the universe cools down in a "Heat Death," and then an eternal nothingness is waiting for us.

Why do acclaimed scientists accept this? Because the infinity takes away their control over knowledge.

But today I want to share my thoughts, as the complexity when he talks falls down when you use the logic of the true infinity against his own physical laws.

Here is the debate:

Tyson says the universe will reach a perfect equilibrium where everything turns off forever. But he and his scientists treat infinity like it is just a "very big number." If you let a Googol of years pass (10^{100}), not even 0.000001% of infinity has passed. Infinity has no edges. Because:

1) The perfect vacuum does not exist: The quantum mechanics he accepts, says that the vacuum is always vibrating with quantum fluctuations. Pure nothingness is physically impossible.

2) The math of Infinity: If the universe turns off and stays in that state for an infinite time, the probability that a quantum fluctuation generates a new Big Bang (a new beginning) is extremely low, almost zero. But in infinity, any probability higher than zero multiplies by infinity and becomes a 100% certainty.

3) The restart is inevitable: If the Big Bang already happened once, it is already proved that existence is possible. Therefore, in an infinite time, the improbable becomes inevitable. It will happen again infinite times.

For Tyson's theory to be true and for us to stay in an eternal nothingness, there would have to exist a physical law that "prohibits" energy from grouping together again in infinity. That law does not exist.

His "Heat Death" is not the end of existence; it is just a statistical pause between two heartbeats of the cosmos.

So, why do they hide this infinite loop from us?

Because the system needs you to believe in a unique beginning and a unique end. That is the structure of fear. It makes you feel small, like a biological accident trapped between two naughts, forcing you to be productive fast so they can stay in mandate.

The ontological shock is imminent and the crack in the cave is already too big for the government to close it again.

Once we understand the concept of infinity, the cave breaks.

What do you guys think?

Posted by dnsierra

4 Comments

  1. AngelofVerdun on

    So funny watching subs like this and just how the psyops work on people. Small jabs at guys like this here and there, Ross Coulthart and others calling them out, and then suddenly now full threads claiming they’re the problem.

  2. BakeLivid3614 on

    Tyson is the biggest fraud. Hes being funded and payed big bucks to rant about BS science to divert and mislead the public of the very nature of reality we experience. Thats why he’s loved by the algorithms and put on the stages of all the major podcasts. Its not because hes smart, its because hes planted there to hide the very truth of our reality. Same with many major scientists.

    We live in a simulated reality. Its not a physical world. Its holographic. Its the way our brain decodes reality.

    *What is real? How do you define ‘real’? If you’re talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, what you can taste and see, then ‘real’ is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain.*

    Quote from Morpheus in the Matrix trilogy. This is what our reality is doing daily.

    Look into David Icke and Micheal Talbots work and you’ll understand the real science behind our world.

  3. PatTheCatMcDonald on

    Paul H Smith did a good masters thesis listing evidence pointing at materialism as pseudo science.

Leave A Reply