The name Matt Groening appears in documents released as part of a lawsuit brought by Virginia Giuffre, who accused Jeffrey Epstein of sex trafficking.
Posted by arabian_mustard
The name Matt Groening appears in documents released as part of a lawsuit brought by Virginia Giuffre, who accused Jeffrey Epstein of sex trafficking.
Posted by arabian_mustard
3 Comments
I love how so many people are alleged to be “in the Epstein files” but not one shred of context is proffered.
Conservative pundit Glenn Beck is “in the Epstein files”. Skip to 5m00s to hear the laughably irrelevant context in which his name comes up: https://www.audacy.com/podcast/the-glenn-beck-program-9864d/episodes/glenn-beck-is-in-the-epstein-files-2226-9433d
So when someone is alleged to be “in the Epstein files” but no context is given, it possibly means nothing.
Want to search the Epstein files for your favorite names so you can smear them with contextless implications: https://www.justice.gov/epstein
These illuminati initiate puppets have to covertly tell you what they do. There are spiritual legal means in what they do that works the magic that blinds us. Just like Satan couldn’t do anything to Job without following certain legal rights he must obey, but not to kill him. So do these people do through predictive programming, they’ll put it in your face, for the sheer law of truth but in an covert manner, that way it gives them a legal binding to which they continue, as you see the world stays blind+ignorant and no one on the Epstein list has been arrested or jailed except for g maxwell not even Trump, or the Prince of England should be standing trial in court, but hey he only gets to be banned from the palace. Smh
“named in the Epstein Files” is a way to dilute the seriousness of them. Was he named 38,000 times? Implicated in anything? Or did some associate of Epstein mention him in an email? Did a schizo claim he raped them in an anonymous tip?