
The discussion thread is for casual and off-topic conversation that doesn't merit its own submission. If you've got a good meme, article, or question, please post it outside the DT. Meta discussion is allowed, but if you want to get the attention of the mods, make a post in /r/metaNL
Announcements
- We're starting a book club! Our first book will be Poor Economics. Discussion will start on August 28th – keep an eye out for a pinned thread. The next books will be All Quiet on the Western Front followed by Narconomics.
Links
Ping Groups | Ping History | Mastodon | CNL Chapters | CNL Event Calendar
Upcoming Events
- Jun 17: Charlotte New Liberals June Social
- Jun 17: Twin Cities New Liberals June Happy Hour
- Jun 17: Atlanta New Liberals June Social
- Jun 18: Advanced Huntsville June Happy Hour
- Jun 18: Seattle New Liberals June Social
- Jun 20: RDU New Liberals June Meetup
- Jun 23: Denver New Liberals June Happy Hour and Social
Posted by jobautomator
10 Comments
So, I’ve got these three cousins. We’ll call them Daniel, Jay, and Louise. They’re getting to the age where they’re fighting over toys a lot. Louise will start playing with a truck, and immediately, Daniel and Jay will want the same truck.
So I thought, you know. Maybe I can inculcate my liberal values in these kiddos. Teach them about the wonders of private property. Why don’t we all form an agreement about which toys belong to whom. And then, the “owner” decides what happens with the toy. Maybe they want to share, maybe they trade, it’s all up to them.
Problem was, they could not ever agree on who owns what. As soon as I ask the question “okay, who wants the castle?” “oh, ME ME ME I NEEEED IT”
Clearly, this wasn’t going to work, so I thought I’d do something more subtle. I’d start with low value items first. A penny, a piece of string, stickers, et cetera. The items would go up progressively in value, and they would each take turns claiming them. If they couldn’t get something they wanted, they would at least take comfort in knowing they’d get the next thing.
This seemed to work well. They seemed to begrudgingly agree to the ownership structure… Until about 5h later, I come back to them hitting each other, yelling, biting, over some god dammed twine. I yanked it out of their hands and yelled “NO! THIS COUSIN JAY’S THREAD!”
Apparently this one is gonna be good. Not living up to the hype so far.
First, suck it catfortune
https://preview.redd.it/5nih5bvcpz7h1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c2e80c72c9b10af20fe4135a2f8d552197245289
Wake up Moscow it’s time for your drone raid!
It’s 1919 and the powerful German Empire signs a humiliating treaty of surrender in Versailles authorizing the payment of hefty sums of war reparations to their sworn enemies
It’s 2026 and the powerful American Empire …
https://preview.redd.it/y4aziy28pz7h1.png?width=672&format=png&auto=webp&s=29dd9199afc1f6d37e4fb2157f027fc7df9364e8
How much does this Iran debacle help Obama’s legacy? I remember all those republicans pearl clutching. I know he wasn’t perfect, maybe even not that great, but Obama was still the best we had.
My (114F) boyfriend (83M) fucked up and wore mismatched clothes to a party even though I SPECIFICALLY told him what to wear. I even went out of my way to buy the clothes myself and he still managed to look like a clown in front of all these people. AITA for yelling at him in front of everyone and then teleporting him into a swamp?
https://preview.redd.it/9ga7oujepz7h1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4f7634660c004b516763ad5a4020d4e3c118bb17
The funny part is looking at Turkish foreign policy he is correct both times
Immigration thread outside the DT? Yeah, I’m probably downvoting half the comments.
We’re a pro-immigration space, not a pro-immigration-only-if-the-public-doesn’t-dislike-it space. And the people — often infrequent posters here — who aren’t pro-immigration at all and are using the public as a pretense to whine about how they were downvoted when they posted anti-immigration comments on this sub four years ago can have another one.