Netanyahu openly wants Argentina to win the World Cup. Look up Israelis starting fires in Patagonia. Messi was given Human Growth Hormones as a child. Who lets a stranger bathe their baby? Then the baby that Messi bathed turns out to be Spain’s top player? Astronomical odds against any of that happening unless it was rigged.
Book it now. Argentina will win the World Cup….. because it is rigged.
Cry a river! Yall hating ass people will cry on Sunday.
Heckin_Frienderino on
who gives a fuck? It’s a fucking sports game
HI-HIHI-HOHO on
Okay, here’s my “expert opinion.”
Let’s assume for a moment that everything we perceive, including ourselves, exists inside a simulation. If that were the case, it would make sense for the system to optimize its use of computational resources whenever it comes under heavy load. A good example would be large, resource-intensive events such as wars or other globally significant processes, such as AI.
One way to do that would be to reduce the amount of computation spent on areas that are less important at that particular moment. To keep access times low and avoid keeping resources occupied for longer than necessary, the simulation might organize or generate data according to principles similar to memory locality, cache efficiency, or other methods that group similar information together.
If that were true, what we experience as remarkable coincidences could simply be a side effect of those optimizations. Similar people, places, events, or ideas would naturally end up being processed in related ways, making patterns that seem incredibly unlikely appear more often than we would expect by pure chance.
From that perspective, phenomena like déjà vu, and perhaps even some instances of the Mandela Effect, could be explained as byproducts of the simulation optimizing for efficiency rather than treating every piece of information as completely independent. In other words, they would not necessarily be glitches, but rather the natural consequence of a system that is constantly balancing computational cost against performance.
4 Comments
Netanyahu openly wants Argentina to win the World Cup. Look up Israelis starting fires in Patagonia. Messi was given Human Growth Hormones as a child. Who lets a stranger bathe their baby? Then the baby that Messi bathed turns out to be Spain’s top player? Astronomical odds against any of that happening unless it was rigged.
Book it now. Argentina will win the World Cup….. because it is rigged.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hindustantimes.com/sports/us-sports/why-benjamin-netanyahu-wants-argentina-to-win-the-2026-world-cup-and-it-has-absolutely-nothing-to-do-with-lionel-messi-101783633385781-amp.html
Cry a river! Yall hating ass people will cry on Sunday.
who gives a fuck? It’s a fucking sports game
Okay, here’s my “expert opinion.”
Let’s assume for a moment that everything we perceive, including ourselves, exists inside a simulation. If that were the case, it would make sense for the system to optimize its use of computational resources whenever it comes under heavy load. A good example would be large, resource-intensive events such as wars or other globally significant processes, such as AI.
One way to do that would be to reduce the amount of computation spent on areas that are less important at that particular moment. To keep access times low and avoid keeping resources occupied for longer than necessary, the simulation might organize or generate data according to principles similar to memory locality, cache efficiency, or other methods that group similar information together.
If that were true, what we experience as remarkable coincidences could simply be a side effect of those optimizations. Similar people, places, events, or ideas would naturally end up being processed in related ways, making patterns that seem incredibly unlikely appear more often than we would expect by pure chance.
From that perspective, phenomena like déjà vu, and perhaps even some instances of the Mandela Effect, could be explained as byproducts of the simulation optimizing for efficiency rather than treating every piece of information as completely independent. In other words, they would not necessarily be glitches, but rather the natural consequence of a system that is constantly balancing computational cost against performance.