What else is part of the bill? I’m sure that isn’t the reason they’re suing
warhoop007 on
What the!!!? That is fucking crazy!! I mean what the fuck!
Sure_Dependent4310 on
It’s because democrats stuck other non-related things into the bill. A bill is no longer a bill, it’s unfortunately lined with corruption and favors. This is why it’s being blocked.
Undeadtech on
Minnesota enacted a first-of-its-kind law banning AI “nudification” technology and apps that generate non-consensual sexual or nude images. Doesn’t specify children so the headline is misleading.
ekoms_stnioj on
To be clear the ban is for *all* AI-enabled nudification including that of adults, it’s not just directed towards images of children. Musks lawsuit includes photos of Trump and his cabinet members in swimsuits that Trump posted on X that were generated with Grok – an example of something that would be illegal under the bill.
They aren’t arguing in favor of being able to create CSAM but that the rule is too broad and unconstitutional limitation of free speech. Personally I don’t agree but this headline is intentionally misleading to make it seem like A) the bill is *only* addressing photos of minors, and B) that Musk is specifically suing to be *able* to legally produce CSAM, which is not the case. The lawsuit is specifically about two things – the satirical creation of images like the one in question, and where the liability of abuse of technology lies. If someone manages to get past the guard rails via prompt engineering, should the model provider be held liable, basically.
MonolithicErik on
This is bullshit by the way. Grok has been completely shut down for content of any kind that is sexual in nature. Grok is dead now. This Democrats Deliver account is a joke.
MrSocrateej on
The problem is that government will label a bill something innocuous like “stop child corn bill” but then throw in all kinds of stupid shit in there. So if you argue against the bill they just point to its title and call you a monster for opposing it.
I assume the bill is poorly written (intentionally or not) to cover not just CP but other innocuous applications of AI. Hes not fighting for the right to make CP, he’s fighting poorly written legislation that claims to protect kids while violating our rights in other ways. Classic misdirection and overreach.
You see this with Flock. It’s ostensibly to protect kids and catch predators but everyone suffers a loss of privacy to do so.
UnderstandingThis636 on
Misinformation as per usual the bill blocks all nudification ai apps/ websites which all AI is capable giving minnisota the power to shut down any AI site it doesn’t like through the courts similar to Texas kick law suit currently going on were Texas got a court order to go directly to cloudfare allowing Texas to sieze the domain with a 9 mil fee to have the ban lifted along with compliance. What laws like this will do is end free speech online
9 Comments
It’s pretty obvious musk is a pdf file
What else is part of the bill? I’m sure that isn’t the reason they’re suing
What the!!!? That is fucking crazy!! I mean what the fuck!
It’s because democrats stuck other non-related things into the bill. A bill is no longer a bill, it’s unfortunately lined with corruption and favors. This is why it’s being blocked.
Minnesota enacted a first-of-its-kind law banning AI “nudification” technology and apps that generate non-consensual sexual or nude images. Doesn’t specify children so the headline is misleading.
To be clear the ban is for *all* AI-enabled nudification including that of adults, it’s not just directed towards images of children. Musks lawsuit includes photos of Trump and his cabinet members in swimsuits that Trump posted on X that were generated with Grok – an example of something that would be illegal under the bill.
They aren’t arguing in favor of being able to create CSAM but that the rule is too broad and unconstitutional limitation of free speech. Personally I don’t agree but this headline is intentionally misleading to make it seem like A) the bill is *only* addressing photos of minors, and B) that Musk is specifically suing to be *able* to legally produce CSAM, which is not the case. The lawsuit is specifically about two things – the satirical creation of images like the one in question, and where the liability of abuse of technology lies. If someone manages to get past the guard rails via prompt engineering, should the model provider be held liable, basically.
This is bullshit by the way. Grok has been completely shut down for content of any kind that is sexual in nature. Grok is dead now. This Democrats Deliver account is a joke.
The problem is that government will label a bill something innocuous like “stop child corn bill” but then throw in all kinds of stupid shit in there. So if you argue against the bill they just point to its title and call you a monster for opposing it.
I assume the bill is poorly written (intentionally or not) to cover not just CP but other innocuous applications of AI. Hes not fighting for the right to make CP, he’s fighting poorly written legislation that claims to protect kids while violating our rights in other ways. Classic misdirection and overreach.
You see this with Flock. It’s ostensibly to protect kids and catch predators but everyone suffers a loss of privacy to do so.
Misinformation as per usual the bill blocks all nudification ai apps/ websites which all AI is capable giving minnisota the power to shut down any AI site it doesn’t like through the courts similar to Texas kick law suit currently going on were Texas got a court order to go directly to cloudfare allowing Texas to sieze the domain with a 9 mil fee to have the ban lifted along with compliance. What laws like this will do is end free speech online