Relevance to this sub: foreign policy insanity, basically a combination of hawkishness towards china and AI policy people being weird. We can’t even handle Iran properly btw
RealHoldenBloodfeast on
I’m okay with a little hawkishness when justified (see un) but this admin’s “punch everything until we’re happy” policy is nuts
chickentendieman on
Hawks are stupid and evil example #10000000000
Spectrum1523 on
> Jacob Stokes, deputy director of the Indo-Pacific Security Program at the Centre for a New American Security (CNAS)
Why should anyone care what this dude says
shillingbut4me on
Why the fuck would an AGI care if it were technically Chinese?
Om_Sapkoat on
maybe a little unhinged, don’t you think?
MyrinVonBryhana on
Isn’t the SCMP literally a Chinese propaganda paper?
Rufio69696969 on
Bitch, what?!
anonOnReddit2001GOTY on
Is this considered insane just due to it being a bad play, or actually wrong morally?
loseniram on
Conservative Hawks are so different from liberal hawks that their needs to be a separate term between pro-humanitarian intervention hawks and pro-republican hawks.
Liberal hawks: we should intervene to stop dictators from committing massacres.
Conservative hawks: nuke Jamaica cause they said mean things to me on twitter
MaximumEffort433 on
Another war? But we haven’t finished our first one!
11 Comments
Relevance to this sub: foreign policy insanity, basically a combination of hawkishness towards china and AI policy people being weird. We can’t even handle Iran properly btw
I’m okay with a little hawkishness when justified (see un) but this admin’s “punch everything until we’re happy” policy is nuts
Hawks are stupid and evil example #10000000000
> Jacob Stokes, deputy director of the Indo-Pacific Security Program at the Centre for a New American Security (CNAS)
Why should anyone care what this dude says
Why the fuck would an AGI care if it were technically Chinese?
maybe a little unhinged, don’t you think?
Isn’t the SCMP literally a Chinese propaganda paper?
Bitch, what?!
Is this considered insane just due to it being a bad play, or actually wrong morally?
Conservative Hawks are so different from liberal hawks that their needs to be a separate term between pro-humanitarian intervention hawks and pro-republican hawks.
Liberal hawks: we should intervene to stop dictators from committing massacres.
Conservative hawks: nuke Jamaica cause they said mean things to me on twitter
Another war? But we haven’t finished our first one!