It is often remarked that everyone on here knows all the latin and greek fallacies.

So we have all these smackdown catch phrases we can throw at people.

They are a little too general for my taste though, and some ideas and argumentation styles are unique to the Reddit community.

Here is a short list I've been drumming up to help us stay flashy:

Bon Sequitur – Follows very well

Is-Nought problem – When empiricism is irrelevant

Argumentum ad plauseum – When repeating an argument actually makes it stronger

Post chalk ergo propter hoc – Ideas can change the world

Iron Man – When you reconstruct a stronger version of your opponent's philosophy and destroy it anyway.

Slippery Nope – Saying "no" to mainstream ideas so often that you accidentally oppose a good libertarian policy.

Tu croquet – Doubting the sincerity of wealthy leftists

Argumentum ad Popugun – When the majority not only disagrees, but is willing to shoot you over it

This is a short list, so please add your own!


Original:

https://forum.freecapitalists.org/t/mises-org-logical-fallacies/16196?u=anenome

Posted by Anen-o-me

2 Comments

  1. > Iron Man – When you reconstruct a stronger version of your opponent’s philosophy and destroy it anyway.

    “Steel-manning” is actually a genuine rhetorical approach.

    > Argumentum ad Popugun – When the majority not only disagrees, but is willing to shoot you over it

    *Argumentum ad baculum* is also often found on lists of formal fallacies.

Leave A Reply