“Keep your finger off the trigger until you are ready to shoot a fed” seems like a reasonable law
SkyHighDeadEye on
It’s funny because you actually contribute nothing to the matter, just a meme and flames to the fire.
The majority of those who think similarly to you have no knowledge pertaining to firearms laws. Those “reasonable common sense” laws are like listening to parrots on repeat, considering universal background checks were put in place 3 decades ago. You are figureheads for an ideology, not proactive contributors. Only living, breathing tools for the division of a country.
Just to prove to you we have already enacted “common sense gun laws”, here are the names of key federal laws and examples of state laws that correspond to the common sense gun regulations you are desperately vying for:
——————————————————
Background Checks
• Federal Law: Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (1993)
——————————————————
Gun-Free Zones
• Federal Law: Gun-Free School Zones Act (1990)
• State Examples: Vary widely, with specific provisions in states like Texas Penal Code § 46.03 and New York Penal Law § 265.01-a.
——————————————————
Red Flag Laws (Extreme Risk Protection Orders)
• State Examples: California’s Gun Violence Restraining Order (California Penal Code §§ 18100–18205), Florida’s Risk Protection Order Act (Florida Statutes § 790.401)
——————————————————
Prohibition for Domestic Abusers
• Federal Law: Gun Control Act of 1968 (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9))
• Federal Law Amendment: Lautenberg Amendment (1996) specifically addresses domestic violence.
——————————————————
Age Restrictions
• Federal Law: Gun Control Act of 1968 (18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(1))
——————————————————
Assault Weapons Bans
• Federal Law: Federal Assault Weapons Ban (expired in 2004)
• State Examples: California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (California Penal Code §§ 30500–30945), New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement (SAFE) Act
——————————————————
Safe Storage Laws
• Federal Law: There is no specific federal law for safe storage, but certain aspects are covered under the Child Safety Lock Act of 2005 (part of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act).
• State Examples: Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 140, § 131L, California Penal Code § 25100
——————————————————
Licensing and Permit Requirements
• State Examples: New York’s Sullivan Act (1911), Illinois Firearm Owner’s Identification (FOID) Card Act (430 ILCS 65)
——————————————————
Prohibition on Straw Purchases
• Federal Law: Gun Control Act of 1968 (18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6))
——————————————————
Waiting Periods
• Federal Law: There is no federal waiting period; however, under the Brady Act, background checks must be completed within three business days.
• State Examples: California Penal Code §§ 26815, 27540 (10-day waiting period)
——————————————————
The only thing left is for the government to do is to take our firearms, one category at a time, under the veil of the lie that we need more “common sense” gun laws that we already have. Uninformed citizens are protesting for background checks, while democrats are trying to pass bills to take away rifles. And the general public isn’t smart enough to discern what’s happening.
*“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”*
No one will take rifles from us under the guise of “common sense.” That isn’t common sense, that’s a conniving seizure of our second amendment rights.
BTRBT on
Sure, sure. One reasonable gun control law: You should not be allowed to use a gun to harm innocent people. If you do, or clearly attempt to, then you should be stopped and forced to pay damages to the aggrieved parties.
The corollary being that if you aren’t using a gun for that purpose, then you shouldn’t be treated like a criminal—eg: forced to report to the government, forced to register with them, arrested for holding or carrying an object, etc—since you haven’t actually done anything wrong.
I think that’s pretty reasonable.
successiseffort on
Luke 22:36
Bertolli_28 on
This is the way
Seventh_Stater on
Praise the LORD and pass the ammunition.
mack_dd on
Um, if you are currently in prison, you need to wait until you get out to get your gun back. I think not letting you bring in your gun to your prison cell sounds fairly reasonable.
12 Comments
Only one I can think of: anyone working for any government directly or indirectly shouldn’t have them.
“Anything the government can have, I can have…”
The right to bea… I mean the right to control guns.. with your .. arms? Sounds reasonable.
Any law that keeps guns out of the hands of people who intend to use them to commit murder
https://youtu.be/w_Np4umPRtE
“Keep your finger off the trigger until you are ready to shoot a fed” seems like a reasonable law
It’s funny because you actually contribute nothing to the matter, just a meme and flames to the fire.
The majority of those who think similarly to you have no knowledge pertaining to firearms laws. Those “reasonable common sense” laws are like listening to parrots on repeat, considering universal background checks were put in place 3 decades ago. You are figureheads for an ideology, not proactive contributors. Only living, breathing tools for the division of a country.
Just to prove to you we have already enacted “common sense gun laws”, here are the names of key federal laws and examples of state laws that correspond to the common sense gun regulations you are desperately vying for:
——————————————————
Background Checks
• Federal Law: Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (1993)
——————————————————
Gun-Free Zones
• Federal Law: Gun-Free School Zones Act (1990)
• State Examples: Vary widely, with specific provisions in states like Texas Penal Code § 46.03 and New York Penal Law § 265.01-a.
——————————————————
Red Flag Laws (Extreme Risk Protection Orders)
• State Examples: California’s Gun Violence Restraining Order (California Penal Code §§ 18100–18205), Florida’s Risk Protection Order Act (Florida Statutes § 790.401)
——————————————————
Prohibition for Domestic Abusers
• Federal Law: Gun Control Act of 1968 (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9))
• Federal Law Amendment: Lautenberg Amendment (1996) specifically addresses domestic violence.
——————————————————
Age Restrictions
• Federal Law: Gun Control Act of 1968 (18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(1))
——————————————————
Assault Weapons Bans
• Federal Law: Federal Assault Weapons Ban (expired in 2004)
• State Examples: California’s Assault Weapons Control Act (California Penal Code §§ 30500–30945), New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement (SAFE) Act
——————————————————
Safe Storage Laws
• Federal Law: There is no specific federal law for safe storage, but certain aspects are covered under the Child Safety Lock Act of 2005 (part of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act).
• State Examples: Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 140, § 131L, California Penal Code § 25100
——————————————————
Licensing and Permit Requirements
• State Examples: New York’s Sullivan Act (1911), Illinois Firearm Owner’s Identification (FOID) Card Act (430 ILCS 65)
——————————————————
Prohibition on Straw Purchases
• Federal Law: Gun Control Act of 1968 (18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6))
——————————————————
Waiting Periods
• Federal Law: There is no federal waiting period; however, under the Brady Act, background checks must be completed within three business days.
• State Examples: California Penal Code §§ 26815, 27540 (10-day waiting period)
——————————————————
The only thing left is for the government to do is to take our firearms, one category at a time, under the veil of the lie that we need more “common sense” gun laws that we already have. Uninformed citizens are protesting for background checks, while democrats are trying to pass bills to take away rifles. And the general public isn’t smart enough to discern what’s happening.
*“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”*
No one will take rifles from us under the guise of “common sense.” That isn’t common sense, that’s a conniving seizure of our second amendment rights.
Sure, sure. One reasonable gun control law: You should not be allowed to use a gun to harm innocent people. If you do, or clearly attempt to, then you should be stopped and forced to pay damages to the aggrieved parties.
The corollary being that if you aren’t using a gun for that purpose, then you shouldn’t be treated like a criminal—eg: forced to report to the government, forced to register with them, arrested for holding or carrying an object, etc—since you haven’t actually done anything wrong.
I think that’s pretty reasonable.
Luke 22:36
This is the way
Praise the LORD and pass the ammunition.
Um, if you are currently in prison, you need to wait until you get out to get your gun back. I think not letting you bring in your gun to your prison cell sounds fairly reasonable.