Serious philosophical question: this is the classic trolley problem, but with nuance: direct violence or indirect mass-scale harm?
Posted by QuintMccabe
Serious philosophical question: this is the classic trolley problem, but with nuance: direct violence or indirect mass-scale harm?
Posted by QuintMccabe
6 Comments
Except, that isnt the choice.
The US needs a massive change in healthcare and it wont happen by shooting someone.
Modern American healthcare was designed and implemented by the Rockefellers over 100 years ago. From how doctors are educated, to how they are certified and can be decertified, to medicine, to regulators and insurers, the system needs a complete overhaul.
Canada is even worse. Both have no choice. Countries that provide choice are vastly better.
Can you guys stop trying to turn this country into a third world shithole?
Do you think that killing CEO actually makes the bad things go away?
Are those who were previously denied no longer being denied now?
I’m not mad at the CEO dying, but do you really think one ceo dying will stop innocent people’s deaths in any way?
Now, all they’re gonna do is hire security everywhere they go and everything else will remain the same
as much as i give not a single fuck about that mans life, killing a single ceo will not stoppatients from being denied healthcare