7 Comments

    1. Lucky_Investment7970 on

      The option of choosing between Russia or the U.S is like having to choose whether to be stabbed from the front or the back.

      It’s a lose-lose situation for Ukraine, they are a mere pawn in the grand old game of political chess.

    2. SS: But of course, we must remember, that it’s also about NATO expansion and the destruction of white Slavic Christians. And that it takes two to tango and that both Zelensky and Putin serve the same masters..

      [https://ibb.co/wLYcHQB](https://ibb.co/wLYcHQB)

      [https://ibb.co/5KbkFqd](https://ibb.co/5KbkFqd)

      [https://ibb.co/HpvTtsp](https://ibb.co/HpvTtsp)

      [https://i.postimg.cc/3JW2GXbH/Zelensky-Meeting-with-MI6-kyivpost-com.png](https://i.postimg.cc/3JW2GXbH/Zelensky-Meeting-with-MI6-kyivpost-com.png)

    3. Aggressive-King3203 on

      Is that why Hitler tried to go the exact same route, easiest to Moscow 🤔🧐 Ukraine “almost” had an SS Battallion… This is Vatican/UN WWIII instead of Vatican/Nazi WWII

    4. Yanukovych was not in power when IMF offered the loan in 2014 so he did not decide Russia. The only condition the IMF imposed with the loan was establishing [anti corruption measures](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Anti-Corruption_Bureau_of_Ukraine) . This was 6 months after Yanukovych fled.

      There was a loan in 2008 by IMF which was put on hold after Ukraine raised minimum wages and pensions contrary to IMF recommendations. Maybe you confusing with this in this poor telling of Ukranian history.

      So because IMF gave Ukraine a loan Putin decided to invade Crimea? Even your story makes no sense. You ignoring Russia trying to rebuild its empire and failing badly

    Leave A Reply