I’ve noticed a number of “Top 1% Commenters” on this sub seem disinterested in discussing / entertaining conspiracies despite interacting with the sub so frequently – why engage with the community so often if it doesn’t interest you?
Posted by bjjones13
5 Comments
That’s the question! I don’t understand it either. It can be okay to not agree with people but some seem over the top, super invested and cruel.
**We are not people here. We are anonymous accounts.**
Accounts that can be operated by dozens of people in dozens of countries or one of dozens of accounts operated by a single person. The person using accounts could be 8 years old from India or a program that isn’t a person at all.
The problem isn’t the answer to this question. The problem is the question itself is flawed and can’t produce any useful answer.
We already know the answer, their goal is to disrupt rational discourse and make sure only the state’s lies are given respect.
Get their location data and you’ll see the massive coincidence that they’re all at Eglin
How do you expect to become a 1%er without making lots of short pithy posts?
TBH there are so many inactive and zombie accounts subscribed that it probably doesn’t take a lot to get the 1% label.