10 Comments

    1. magasheepgotfleeced on

      What evidence do you have that the campaign ever posted these ai pics?

      There have been dozens of these posts here in the last 24 hours, but no one can find an example of the campaign actually using them.

      Seems like conservative media/social influencers generated some bad AI pics to manufacture a controversy.

    2. Jiminy__Crickets on

      When a candidate is dependent on AI to boost their candidate’s popularity within its own voter base, you know the candidate has serious flaws.

      Meanwhile, state media, social media bots, and paid contributors continue to push ‘how amazingly qualified and popular Kamala is…’

    3. Let’s say this image has been AI enhanced. Is there a difference between Harris lying like that vs Trump lying about crowd size? Maybe photos from his campaign aren’t photoshopped, but he definitely lies about crown size. Do you feel one side lying is worse than the other? Both lies are to influence how people think about their popularity, yes?

    4. ZombieRichardNixonx on

      I dunno, most Democrats I know are super hyped about her (and particularly Walz).

    5. CompetitiveAd1338 on

      You know, we have been deceived for a long time.

      Only the tools/technology to deceive the people has changed with time.

      Before it used to be fake/staged photos, fake radio and newspaper reports, fake videos.

      Now its all fake photoshop style A.I. deepfakes and CGI.

      We need to question EVERYTHING we see through a videoscreen now.

      Anything could be a fake lie potentially.

    6. WorknForTheWeekend on

      That first image is so unbelievably bad, that it’s proof enough to me these are being created by bad actors to spread misinformation and doubt. Nobody in good faith would publish something so grotesque and unconvincing.

    Leave A Reply