Her whole campaign is fake AF. Pretend you have support so you can cheat again? They love to talk about cheap fakes and now we know why, pics don’t lie unless they’re from the Harris campaign.
What evidence do you have that the campaign ever posted these ai pics?
There have been dozens of these posts here in the last 24 hours, but no one can find an example of the campaign actually using them.
Seems like conservative media/social influencers generated some bad AI pics to manufacture a controversy.
DarkleCCMan on
Politics is Kayfabe.
Jiminy__Crickets on
When a candidate is dependent on AI to boost their candidate’s popularity within its own voter base, you know the candidate has serious flaws.
Meanwhile, state media, social media bots, and paid contributors continue to push ‘how amazingly qualified and popular Kamala is…’
Creative-Ocelot8691 on
Another anti-Harris post, trumpers sure are scared
AmNotLost on
Let’s say this image has been AI enhanced. Is there a difference between Harris lying like that vs Trump lying about crowd size? Maybe photos from his campaign aren’t photoshopped, but he definitely lies about crown size. Do you feel one side lying is worse than the other? Both lies are to influence how people think about their popularity, yes?
ZombieRichardNixonx on
I dunno, most Democrats I know are super hyped about her (and particularly Walz).
CompetitiveAd1338 on
You know, we have been deceived for a long time.
Only the tools/technology to deceive the people has changed with time.
Before it used to be fake/staged photos, fake radio and newspaper reports, fake videos.
Now its all fake photoshop style A.I. deepfakes and CGI.
We need to question EVERYTHING we see through a videoscreen now.
Anything could be a fake lie potentially.
WorknForTheWeekend on
That first image is so unbelievably bad, that it’s proof enough to me these are being created by bad actors to spread misinformation and doubt. Nobody in good faith would publish something so grotesque and unconvincing.
arcesious on
It doesn’t make the problem any less bad when it’s used in a gaslighting manner.
breakslow on
/r/conspiracy supporting a billionaire friend of Epstein was not on my bingo card.
10 Comments
What evidence do you have that the campaign ever posted these ai pics?
There have been dozens of these posts here in the last 24 hours, but no one can find an example of the campaign actually using them.
Seems like conservative media/social influencers generated some bad AI pics to manufacture a controversy.
Politics is Kayfabe.
When a candidate is dependent on AI to boost their candidate’s popularity within its own voter base, you know the candidate has serious flaws.
Meanwhile, state media, social media bots, and paid contributors continue to push ‘how amazingly qualified and popular Kamala is…’
Another anti-Harris post, trumpers sure are scared
Let’s say this image has been AI enhanced. Is there a difference between Harris lying like that vs Trump lying about crowd size? Maybe photos from his campaign aren’t photoshopped, but he definitely lies about crown size. Do you feel one side lying is worse than the other? Both lies are to influence how people think about their popularity, yes?
I dunno, most Democrats I know are super hyped about her (and particularly Walz).
You know, we have been deceived for a long time.
Only the tools/technology to deceive the people has changed with time.
Before it used to be fake/staged photos, fake radio and newspaper reports, fake videos.
Now its all fake photoshop style A.I. deepfakes and CGI.
We need to question EVERYTHING we see through a videoscreen now.
Anything could be a fake lie potentially.
That first image is so unbelievably bad, that it’s proof enough to me these are being created by bad actors to spread misinformation and doubt. Nobody in good faith would publish something so grotesque and unconvincing.
It doesn’t make the problem any less bad when it’s used in a gaslighting manner.
/r/conspiracy supporting a billionaire friend of Epstein was not on my bingo card.