I’m sure they were completely fine with those same students participating in violent BLM riots that burned down businesses and police stations. I wonder what the difference is?

    Posted by lboog423

    10 Comments

    1. Existing_Device339 on

      I don’t think they were fine with that? If that had occurred, the student would be arrested, charged, and slotted for deportation. This is deporting students who have committed no crimes.

    2. SS: All of these astroturfed protests and riots for the last 10 years have been orchestrated chaos, yet for some unknown reason, those student protests went too far this time, which might lead the government to reject their visas. I wonder what changed?

    3. Randon_Tomato_Event on

      There were 10,000 arrests that summer. Who really benefits from the race war narrative you’re pushing?

    4. Vault31dweller on

      I guess it depends if you have constitutional rights to free speech under a student visa. I have no idea if foreign students have free speech or not. I can see this possibly being contested if somehow they have some constitutional right to free speech. I guess my assumption was everyone on US soil had free speech but I really don’t know the nitty gritty of the rules involving visas. I would assume as a visitor to another country my rights might vary depending on their visa rules. Anyone know anything about it? It really depends on the rules. The BLM protesting was probably different because I think a lot of US citizens were taking part of that particular protest and they would be covered by the constitution.

    5. >I can’t defend what my guy is doing. So let’s just point out that the other side are hypocritical partisan trash as well.

    6. >I can’t defend what my guy is doing. So let’s just point out that the other side is full of hypocritical partisan trash as well.

    Leave A Reply