
Legislation introduced in Missouri would create a list of “at risk” pregnant women in the state in order to “reduce the number of preventable abortions.” House Bill 807, nicknamed the “Save MO Babies Act,” was proposed by Republican state Rep. Phil Amato.
The bill summary states that, if passed, Missouri would create a registry of every expecting mother in the state “who is at risk for seeking an abortion” starting July 1, 2026. The list would be created through the Maternal and Child Services division of the Department of Social Services, but the measure did not specify how the “at risk” would be identified.
This registry would also incorporate hopeful adoptive parents who have completed certain screenings, including background checks, home studies and other investigations, according to the legislation.
Additionally, the bill would mandate the promotion of “the safe and healthy birth of children in the state through the utilization of existing resources; coordinate community resources and provide assistance or services to expecting mothers identified to be at risk for seeking abortion services; and prevent abortions through the adoption of children by fit and proper adoptive parents.”
A response, evaluation and legal team comprised of 10 members would be appointed between the director of the Department of Social Services, Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe (R) and the state Supreme Court.
In November, Missouri voters narrowly approved a ballot measure to add the right to an abortion to their state constitution. More than a month later, a judge ruled that Missouri’s near-total abortion ban, which went into effect in 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, was unenforceable under the new constitutional amendment.
Posted by John3262005
6 Comments
Handmaid’s Tale here we come. Party of small government btw
Okay how do you go from “we want smaller government” to pregnant women registry.
Also I am pretty sure that Missouri has bigger things to focus on. California isn’t very well run but it makes the deep south (minus Georgia due to recent development) look like a paradise.
> but the measure did not specify how the “at risk” would be identified.
“At risk” = every pregnant woman
That’s exactly why these ghouls won’t specify further.
Birther Stasi would like to see your papers please.
Reminds me of the Texas law that [bans people from changing their gender marker on their driver’s license, and puts you on a list if you ever got it changed or asked about it, AND reverts your license on top of it](https://www.texastribune.org/2024/08/21/transgender-texans-drivers-license-DPS/)
Turns out the republicans REALLY like making databases of people they’re saying are evil and need to be forcibly punished, but surely that’s just posturing and we’re being histrionic, right?
!ping SNEK&FEMINISTS