They’re citing the anti-commandeering doctrine, for those who are wondering. And it’s actually an argument that maybe stands a chance in this iteration of SCOTUS, given it sounds pretty similar to the reasoning they used to kill the Medicaid expansion mandate in NFIB v. Sebelius; legal experts, please do weigh in. If you or you child are disabled, and you aren’t wealthy, you might be in for tough times.
modularpeak2552 on
These people are so fucking evil
quickblur on
>According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Section 504 prevents any employer or organization that receives federal money, such as Medicaid, from discriminating against “qualified individuals with disabilities.”
3 Comments
They’re citing the anti-commandeering doctrine, for those who are wondering. And it’s actually an argument that maybe stands a chance in this iteration of SCOTUS, given it sounds pretty similar to the reasoning they used to kill the Medicaid expansion mandate in NFIB v. Sebelius; legal experts, please do weigh in. If you or you child are disabled, and you aren’t wealthy, you might be in for tough times.
These people are so fucking evil
>According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Section 504 prevents any employer or organization that receives federal money, such as Medicaid, from discriminating against “qualified individuals with disabilities.”
For those who didn’t know what it was like me.