Henry Ford envisioned a future where cars could run on renewable resources, alcohol-based fuel, Rockefeller to maintain his hold on the fuel industry leveraged his wealth he contributed about $9 million today to the ASL with prohibition in place the large-scale production of ethanol was stifled.

SS:
In the early 20th century, Henry Ford envisioned a future where cars could run on renewable resources, specifically alcohol-based fuel. He saw ethanol, an alcohol derived from crops like corn and potatoes, as a sustainable alternative to gasoline. This aligned with Ford’s broader goal of supporting American agriculture and building a transportation system that could benefit local farmers by creating a market for their surplus crops.

Ford’s Model T, designed with the flexibility to run on ethanol, gasoline, or a mixture of the two, was central to this vision. Ford believed ethanol fuel had the potential to make the automobile accessible and environmentally sustainable, tapping into a homegrown fuel source rather than relying on fossil fuels. This approach not only positioned ethanol as a potentially less polluting option but also as a strategic economic opportunity for rural communities, which Ford saw as a way to foster self-sufficiency and reduce dependency on oil.

As Ford put it in 1925: “The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like that sumach out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust—almost anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can be fermented.” This statement underscored his belief in the potential of alcohol as a flexible, renewable resource that could serve as an alternative to gasoline. However, external forces would soon work to shift this vision away from ethanol and towards gasoline as the primary automotive fuel.

John D. Rockefeller, the head of Standard Oil, saw the potential rise of alcohol-based fuels as a competitive threat to his gasoline empire. With alcohol-based engines already in development, including Henry Ford’s ethanol-compatible engines, Rockefeller recognized that if ethanol became a mainstream fuel, it could undermine his market for gasoline.

To maintain his hold on the fuel industry, Rockefeller leveraged his wealth and influence. He contributed $500,000 (roughly $9 million today) to the Anti-Saloon League, a key organization promoting Prohibition, to secure a legal framework that would restrict alcohol production in the United States. Prohibition, passed in 1920, effectively curbed the production, sale, and distribution of alcohol, which made ethanol fuel production almost impossible on a commercial scale.

By funding the movement to outlaw alcohol, Rockefeller limited the development of an alternative fuel industry, reinforcing gasoline as the dominant automotive fuel. This tactic allowed Rockefeller to secure Standard Oil’s place at the heart of America’s industrial and transportation systems for decades to come.

Rockefeller’s strategy was subtle but effective: Prohibition didn’t specifically outlaw ethanol fuel, but by banning the production, sale, and distribution of alcohol, it undermined the infrastructure and public acceptance of alcohol as a substance. This lack of available sources for industrial-grade ethanol effectively crippled the potential for alcohol-based fuels to compete with gasoline.

With Prohibition in place, the large-scale production of ethanol was stifled, leaving gasoline as the only widely available fuel source. This indirect approach allowed Rockefeller to sideline Ford’s ethanol-compatible engine plans without ever needing to address them head-on. Over time, as the availability of ethanol dwindled and gasoline remained plentiful, Henry Ford and other manufacturers had little choice but to align with gasoline as the primary fuel for their vehicles. Ford ultimately abandoned his ethanol-based vision for a model that ran exclusively on gasoline, cementing gasoline’s place as the dominant automotive fuel.

Rockefeller’s influence through Prohibition created a legacy that shifted the fuel industry’s trajectory, securing a market for Standard Oil and reshaping the future of automotive fuel in America for generations.

In the end, Rockefeller’s strategy was both powerful and enduring. By targeting the sources of alcohol rather than attacking ethanol-powered engines directly, he effectively removed ethanol fuel as a viable alternative to gasoline. The Anti-Saloon League’s success in pushing for Prohibition ensured that breweries and distilleries—potential sources of fuel-grade ethanol—were shut down or repurposed. This maneuver constrained the infrastructure that could have supported Ford’s ethanol vision, shifting the industry towards gasoline.

Rockefeller’s influence created a lasting legacy, embedding gasoline as the standard automotive fuel for much of the 20th century. This reshaped the automotive landscape, aligning it with the oil industry and securing Standard Oil’s—and, by extension, Rockefeller’s—dominance. By cutting off alcohol production at its roots, Rockefeller limited the potential of ethanol fuel without having to challenge Ford’s engine directly, ultimately setting the course of American transportation and energy reliance for decades.

If the alcohol engine had been given the same level of development focus as gasoline engines during the 20th century, the Earth would be a less polluted place, and the systems of control, both economic and geopolitical, would be fundamentally transformed due to altered energy dependencies.

A modern ethanol engine, designed with today’s materials, fuel systems, and controls, would likely have a significant environmental advantage and present a sustainable alternative. This could mark a revolution in how we think about fuel and transportation—if ethanol had been given the same chance to develop as gasoline, we might be looking at a vastly different world today.

Also, learn about Eugen Diesel and how he died !!

They do not want you to be independent !!