
(…)
energy density at 226 Wh/kg, which falls comfortably within the range of existing lithium tech.
(…)
battery chemistry relies on cellulose, the structural plant material used to make paper, as the medium for ion transfer between the anode and cathode. Flint then replaces problematic non-renewables like cobalt and lithium with less environmentally impactful, easily recycled metals like zinc and manganese.
(…)
the company believes it can eventually build its batteries for roughly US$50/kWh, less than half the average 2024 cost of lithium-ion. That's thanks largely to the use of those abundantly available sustainable materials and metals that are easier and less costly to mine than traditional battery metals.
(…)
Flint claims its cellulose-based battery is significantly safer and more stable than lithium, virtually eliminating the chance of catastrophic fire. The water-based electrolytes are stable and non-toxic and formulated to prevent overheating, sparking and explosion.
(…)
Posted by oatballlove

2 Comments
I can’t comprehend.
I’m too brainwashed by the global oil elite to think there could be something better than dinosaur fuel.
I’ll believe it 18 months after it hits market and i’ve been using it. Until then we’ve heard so so so so so so so many battery stories that never pan out that I discount them out of hand.