Found a very strong argument against low-skilled immigration which I couldn't really think of a good response.
The arguments boiled down:
- high skilled migration is a net positive
- low skilled migration is a short term positive long term negative
- refugee migration is a net negative
He fleshed these out with verious explanation the most compelling of which surrounded the multi-generational costs. He described how children of low skilled and refugee migrants usually don't out do their parents in economic or educational attainment and that these children and even the second generation of children are still behind in educational attainment which correlates with minimal economic advancement and being a net payee of taxes.
What are your thoughts?
Posted by ModernMaroon
1 Comment
I blame the Russians