6 Comments

    1. **You’re trying to do orbital math with middle school trig and a 28mm camera spec sheet. Respect the effort, but this isn’t it.**

      First off, you’re using flat-Earth math on a curved Earth photo and acting like it’s definitive!

      The field of view formula you’re quoting assumes linear geometry and no lens distortion—which is ***flat-out wrong*** when you’re dealing with a wide-angle image taken from orbit. You also ***completely ignore*** the tilt of the camera, Earth’s curvature, and lens barrel distortion at 28mm. That’s a massive oversimplification.

      Also, you treat the ISS like it’s a ghost ship when **it’s tracked in real-time by amateur astronomers around the world, down to the second.** You can see it with your own eyes flying overhead at ~408 km altitude. You can bounce radio signals off it. People photograph it transiting the moon and sun all the time. Are they all in on it too?

      The ISS orbit is public. The photo was taken from a real location with known altitude and trajectory. The camera might be real, but you’re ignoring key variables like cropping, digital zoom, camera angle, and field curvature. You can’t calculate altitude based on a single image without knowing how the photo was framed.

      This post is built on the illusion of precision—math that looks serious but falls apart under actual scrutiny (a lot like our leadership!)

      The ISS isn’t fake. But the logic here? Yeah, that is…

    2. Tall-Bed-5064 on

      There going to all this trouble to fake space, moon landings, ISS , the question is why? Spend billions to fake this. Makes you think about they’re going to all this trouble and expense? What are they trying so hard to hide? Well, Jesus said what’s done in the dark will come to the light. When it does all these “experts are going to look real bad. Trust God before the door of salvation closes.

    Leave A Reply