6 Comments

    1. VerneUnderWater on

      This possibly suggests the vaccine targeting something in particular or genes and systemic processes in certain people fighting it off. Possibly larger doses in certain batches? Some crazy shit for sure. Even if numbers are off, it would be interesting to get a full angle on what causes it to not be 90% or better in the first week.

      We’ve also seen data on the boosters being worse in some cases. Could just be batch dependent then.

    2. ProtectedHologram on

      SS

      If we ever needed more proof that the regulating agencies give zero fucks about public health here it is

      Instead of investigating this, the parents of these kids are called liars and ridiculed – then these shots are required to enroll kids in schools you pay taxes to fund.

    3. Exo-Proctologist on

      Where’s the control group? How are you determining that these infants would have *not* died if they hadn’t been vaccinated? SIDS has been around for several hundred years, even before vaccines.

    4. Ja_Rule_Here_ on

      Correlation != causation.

      But correlation IS often the first place to look for causation.

    5. Infants get a number of routine shots within their first few months. 90% of SIDs occur within the first 6 months. Add that to the fact this is VAERS data, that is, self reported, and it makes this data utterly meaningless. 

      How many SIDs cases occur where the parents didn’t make a VAERS report? If the claim that this article is making that the vaccine adjuvants “like aluminum can pass the blood brain barrier” then an autopsy would prove that, no? Do they have any medical reports written by a doctor to confirm these self reported cases? 

    Leave A Reply