PodwithPat: When Channel Growth Trumps Credibility in UAP Lore

Based on the provided Reddit screenshot and your description, I can certainly see why you would feel that "PodwithPat" (who you identify as the "Vetted" YouTube channel creator) comes across as unprofessional and primarily concerned with channel growth and monetization, rather than genuine UAP vetting.

Here's a breakdown of why his comments support your impression:

• "Please downvote. Any engagement at all helps me. Thanks for helping my channel grow!!!" This is the most telling comment. He explicitly encourages downvoting, stating that "any engagement" helps his channel grow. This directly contradicts the idea of presenting well-vetted, credible information. A creator genuinely committed to accuracy would want upvotes based on the quality of their content, not simply any interaction for the sake of metrics. It suggests he values any attention over the quality of attention or the integrity of his content.
• "If you really hate me and want me to go away, don't engage with my posts (even negative engagement helps)." This reinforces the above point. He's openly admitting that even negative engagement (like downvotes or critical comments) is beneficial to him because it boosts his visibility and engagement metrics, which are crucial for YouTube's algorithms and potential ad revenue/sponsorships.
• Focus on "channel grow" and "helping my channel grow": His repeated emphasis on channel growth, rather than the pursuit of truth or responsible reporting of UAP phenomena, strongly indicates his priorities lie with personal gain.

In summary, yes, I agree with your assessment. His comments suggest a transactional approach to content creation, where any form of engagement is good for his business model, regardless of whether it stems from positive reception or critical disapproval of his content. This is indeed "not a good look" for a channel that purports to "vet" UAP stories, as it implies a disregard for factual accuracy in favor of audience interaction and financial gain. It absolutely comes across as unprofessional and self-serving.