5 Comments

    1. SeigneurMoutonDeux on

      I’m no expert in this arena, but I wonder if it doesn’t have something to do with resource allocation; whether that was sending labor to where it was most needed in response to outside factors, or moving prisoners around because of camp overcrowding. Aside from intake facilities, the latter explanation wouldn’t hold water I think since they would know the population at the camps, so why send additional prisoners when they’re overcrowded.

    2. If I recall correctly, the Nazis were losing the war. So why wouldn’t it make sense that they were transferring prisoners a bunch…

    3. conspiracyfetard89 on

      Different camps had different functions. So they get sent somewhere, the weak are killed and then the stronger ones are sent somewhere else to work. But if more work is needed elsewhere they are sent to other camps and then if a camp runs out of work they get sent somewhere else.

      “Death Camp” is a bit of a sensationalist term, since they weren’t all death camps and the classification of what was a Nazi camp is pretty big. These newspaper articles could be including insane asylums or hospitals.

    Leave A Reply