Denver voters rejected housing and a ‘free’ park. The public may pay $70M for a bigger park, instead

Posted by Guardax

5 Comments

  1. > Almost two years ago, Denver voters blocked a developer’s plan to build housing, retail and a public park at the defunct Park Hill Golf Course site.

    > Local activists celebrated the demise of the project. They wanted to preserve the entire 155-acre site for open space and recreation. And now, they’re set for an even bigger reward: Mayor Mike Johnston wants to spend $70 million in public debt to start building out a major regional park on the site, part of the Vibrant Denver debt spending proposal.

    >Members of the housing advocacy group YIMBY Denver are frustrated voters are being asked to spend public money on something they could have had — at a smaller scale — without costing the city a cent.

    > If voters had approved Referred Question 2O, it would have allowed for Westside Investment Partners to build a mixed-use development that promised 100 acres of open space on the land.

    > Now, “$70,000,000 is being spent to start (not finish) something we could have gotten for free, all because a small group misled enough voters about costs and outcomes to defeat 2O during an off-year primary election,” developer David Pardo wrote on behalf of YIMBY Denver.

  2. Maps_and_Politics on

    The fact that it’s a defunct golf course too is just wild. Literally, who is fucking using it?

Leave A Reply