I’m seeing that the twitter spat between Nick Fuentes and Candace Owens (among others) is now turned to this topic.

    I’ve been looking into this myself for a couple of weeks, and I’ve found some interesting things.

    Here’s what I know:

    Despite being an important figure at J6, he was never charged. This is despite video footage of him inciting violence. The most common defence of this is “He was never on capitol grounds.” Oh, so the feds are playing by strict rules now? Why wouldn’t they imprison somebody who is a threat to the system? 4D chess?

    Despite claims of being debanked for years on end, the DOJ withdrew its request to have his assets frozen on July 21st, 2021. I’ll provide an image of this. It’s from a the grayzone article titled “Is Nick Fuentes the future of America First, or its kiss of death?” though it’s been posted by others on X.

    Fuentes has posted a conversation with Milo Yiannopoulos. In it, Milo warns Nick about J6, on January 5, 2021 specifically. Now obviously this incriminates both of them. Both knew, neither issued a warning for people not to go. Milo only said he’s not going himself, and was vague about the whole situation publicly. But Nick lead his followers into the trap, knowing that it is indeed one, and incited violence. Now I don’t know how Nick is trying to spin things, however admitting he knew about J6 being a trap more than 4 years after the fact isn’t exactly a good look.

    Admittedly I don’t know much about Milo. But this all looks suspicious to me, and I’m sure there’s more to learn.

    Also, how does a relatively unknown internet personality go about being friends with someone like Kanye, an internationally famous rapper? As well as having dinner with a (then) former president?

    What are your thoughts? Am I missing anything? Is my reasoning here wrong?

    Posted by ResponsibilityOk641

    25 Comments

    1. OpenThePlugBag on

      Im sure lots of the alt right media sphere has been infected with feds, especially after January 6th, the feds all now have probably cause.

    2. omg not them actually using bank of america or the face of boe… i thought that part was a joke. neways. i don’t think he’s fEd, but he’s definitely not creating his own content lmao lbr. i’ve watched him for 10 secs and figured that out

    3. Literally they will say anything to discredit Fuentes. He’s been talking about Israeli money/influence in American politics for years, now he’s blowing up because so many people woke up and see through the bs after Gaza & Epstein. 

    4. comosedicedevon on

      I don’t believe Nick is a fed.. I trust Nick way more than Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens and Milo.. I’ll think differently when one of his accusers comes back with even half the amount evidence he is able to present on them

    5. skeptical_spice on

      >The most common defence of this is “He was never on capitol grounds.” Oh, so the feds are playing by strict rules now? Why wouldn’t they imprison somebody who is a threat to the system? 4D chess?

      They would still have to go through a jury for charges. Fuentes is generally pretty careful about his speech such that he’s not prosecutable.

      Are there comparable j6 folks that were charged when Fuentes wasn’t?

    6. LaLuzIluminada on

      Never heard of him but reminds me of the AJ lawsuits. 

      Public displays of ish by ‘public figures’ in order to dissuade anyone else from attempting to mess with or question ‘official narratives’. 

      ‘This is what happens if you try to question and/or challenge ‘official narratives’. Don’t do it, ‘regular humans’ or you’ll have to pay for it. 🤔🤨

    7. Legal_Ant_8900 on

      I find it interesting that Nick, Candace, and Tucker all criticized Israel recently, and now suddenly they’re all fighting amongst themselves.

    8. PriceofObedience on

      I don’t know.

      On J6, people who weren’t actually present at the capitol were charged with crimes against the state, whereas he was present and wasn’t charged at all. That makes me think he’s a fed.

      Conversely, the kneejerk reaction by Tucker (who is actually CIA-adjacent) and Candace (tried to work for the Daily Wire, which is potentially mossad adjacent) makes me think he might not be.

      The only thing I know for sure is that people who have a lot of cultural pull and are antisemitic in America usually get killed or sequestered from the rest of society. Fuentes says he’s being targeted, but he’s been allowed to say some pretty crazy things.

      My guess is that he’s only been allowed to speak because it serves a specific purpose by the CIA. To blame for a false flag maybe? Something to fully justify Palantir and everything that comes afterwards?

      Again, no idea, just spitballing.

    9. White1994Rabbit on

      Reading this post and comment section really shows how ignorant people still are. How are you not seeing what is happening here? Nick a fed? That just proves to me you have never watched any of his livestreams, or know anything about Nick. It’s unreal that people are still falling for the same tricks over and over again, come on people for god sake. Trust what Elon Musk says about anything is a wild take, especially on a conspiracy sub. Have you’s learned nothing at all over the last decade?

    10. All the screenshot is showing is his bank account getting unfrozen. How does that make him a fed?

    11. Easiest fed (or more specifically CIA) to spot in history. He sucks so much he’s basically the right equivalent of leftist mouth breather David Hogg.

    12. Seems more likely that Milo is the fed and is using Fuentes to keep tabs on all the extremists. I think Hasan Piker might be in a similar situation, but we just don’t know who his handler is.

    13. White1994Rabbit on

      What’s the purpose of making a post like this and then asking for everybody’s thoughts and is my reasoning wrong, and then attacking anyone that gives you their thoughts and reasons, either insulting, gaslighting, or just making up lies to anybody that explains why you’re wrong.

    14. No, it’s part of a push back on debanking of conservatives. It’s been converted in the news.

    15. Actual real federal agents are calling him a fed and every other name in the book to try to discredit him. Including op whom responds to each and every comment on here almost like this is his job or he was paid to do so.

      Yeah the guy who is debanked, not allowed to own a credit card, can only accept donations with bitcoin, had a guy come to his home to kill him, that has every fed under the sun calling him a fed. Yeah this kid is a fed. It’s laughable.

    16. No hes not a fed. They’re going after him, Elon Musk / Tucker Carlson / Candace Owen’s all targeting him lol. It’s obvious

    17. I think Op is a fed. Op trying to convince us that Nick is a fed.
      This tactic called black-jacking. You can google it.

      You can watch Nick’s steamings by yourself on rumble. Dont belive what other people say if you can see it by yourself.

      We will see more post like this in every social media.

    Leave A Reply