14 Comments

    1. MrMojoRisin2THREE on

      Why the fuck would a sniper need someone to stand next to the target giving hand signals ? Do you have any critical thinking skills? How would that possibly assist a sniper in any way.

    2. This is a stretch. The guy wasn’t trying to steal second and hand signals aren’t needed in any way for what transpired. For fuck sake, even if you want to force the narrative with the first guy, the second dude literally adjusted his shirt sleeve lol.

    3. One guy dressed in white, one dressed in black. In case the shooter could not see one of them based on if they were against a light or dark colored background?

    4. I’m skeptical. I touch my hat and face a lot, and the guy in black has been with Kirk forever. Though I suppose it wouldn’t be the first time someone was bribed/blackmailed to turn against the person they were supposed to protect.

      I think the question I’d ask here is why was a signal needed? A professional would likely be using an earpiece with a handler if they were waiting for a specific moment to strike, no?

    5. CryptidToothbrush on

      Nobody is going to stand that close to a target being shot from at least 200 yards away. That’s ridiculous.

    6. This post depicts 2 men standing behind Charlie Kirk using secret hand signals before the tragic event. @ Mods

    Leave A Reply