Candace Owens says that Charlie Kirk being shot in the throat was symbolic because he was using his voice not in the way that they wanted. Do you think they wanted to silence his voice and to send a message to scare others?

    Posted by SuperStarBoyOne

    16 Comments

    1. Yes I do. I said this exact same thing to someone when I first heard the news. I think Vance ordered the hit, personally. Republicans would probably have voted for Charlie over Vance in the next election cycle if he decided to run.

    2. She’s been vocal against the support of Israel as it’s becoming more and more apparent that Netenyahu is pretty much a modern Hitler (based on actions – not his personal background).

      Both Israel and France have been coming for her as well. 

    3. FrankieSaysRelax311 on

      The most important part that won’t leave my mind is.. they decided to do this in front of thousands of kids.

    4. Platform_Efficient on

      Or, the shooter missed and happened to hit his throat. It is very likely that the Shooter was aiming for his head and didn’t account for the bullet drop across the distance.

    5. spicydrynoodles on

      He was using his voice to blame school on shootings on antifa and ‘gang violence’. You think big woke merked him?

    6. But he wasn’t shot in the throat. He was shot in the chest and the bullet hit a plate in his bullet proof vest and deflected at least some of the bullet fragment into his neck. There’s a video angle taken from his left side where you can see the initial impact was clearly on his chest.

    Leave A Reply