Charlie Kirk’s letter to Bibi.

Charlie Kirk's alleged final letter to Netanyahu was published by the New York Post today.

You can find it here. (It's very long.)

No doubt many people will say this proves that Charlie was loyal to Israel to the end, and that they had no motive to kill him.

Those people are either lying, or they have low reading comprehension.

To me, it's clear that Charlie is expressing frustration that he was tasked with defending the indefensible.

He's telling Bibi that "the status quo is not working" and that Israel needs its own influencers instead of relying on him. It's practically a resignation letter.

Let's do a close reading, shall we?

I started to compose this letter to you on Easter. I should have been focused on my family, but I was getting bombarded with messages about the Israeli army making it difficult for Christians to access church in Jerusalem on Easter . . . It was frustrating because pro Israel surrogates like me should not be in charge of fact checking every piece of anti Israel misinformation that pours into social media.

Yikes! Would you send a letter to your boss like that, if you wanted to keep your job? The jab about Easter is clearly a bitter, passive aggressive shot at BiBi. Charlie must have been at his wit's end to send a letter like this to the scariest man on Earth.

. . . I'm constantly confronted with:

"Israel is an apartheid state."
"Why does Israel conduct ethnic cleansing?
"Why is America subsidizing Israel's genocide against the Palestinian people?"
"Is American aid helping to subsidize Israel's free health care?
"Israel and the Jews are running U.S. foreign policy."
"Israel and Jews are responsible for 9/11."
"Defending Israel is not in our U.S. national interest."
"Why is Israel trying to drag us into a war in the Middle East?"

Look at all these questions that I'm confronted with, that I have no answer for! (Charlie had BALLS to straight-up pose these questions to Netanyahu.)

I strongly suggest Israel NOT always depend on "subcontracting" their information war efforts to surrogates in America.

&

I strongly recommend putting together a team of pro-Israel experts who can fact-check misinformation in real time from Israel. Israel needs to take the lead in this effort – no more dependence on subcontractors. Israel never asks for American troops because Israel does its own fighting. I suggest the same approach for the information war. You lead and people like me will follow and provide supplemental support. [Bolded emphasis is mine].

Translation: I am tired of being your frontline PR. Find someone else.

Bottom line is Israel needs to learn to fish (ie. create your own content) and be more self-reliant when it comes to your communications strategy.

…If you told your homicidal boss (who was paying you millions of dollars) that he needed to "learn to fish" and "be more self-reliant," do you think he would take it well?

Charlie's 7-page letter was FILLED with desperate, passive aggressive, and somewhat condescending suggestions on how Israel could take initiative in it's own PR strategy, instead of hanging him out to dry.

Bottom line: Charlie Kirk was TIRED of running PR for Israel. He knew he was in a losing position.

I am told that the Israelis have exceptionally high Verbal IQ. No doubt they could read between the lines.

I am NOT saying that Israel killed Charlie Kirk. We don't have enough information to conclude anything.

But anyone who is saying that this letter proves that Charlie was their eager Shabbos goy to the end is being disingenuous.