Both Blue Origin and “Starship” need multiple in-orbit refueling to get to the moon.
“Boil-off” with the orbiting fuel tanker is the issue and the fuel needs to be vented off into space.
That is of course, if Starship can get to orbit and then get to orbit with a payload of fuel and then dock and transfer that fuel to an orbiting tanker.
These would all be significant “firsts” for space travel and have yet to be achieved.
Here is a great link that explains just how unnecessarily complicated the Artemis III mission is compared to the Apollo missions.
Of course, The Nazi rocket scientist and Apollo Moon Mission chief Von Braun said that they would need a Rocketship the size of the Empire State building to get to the moon but he must have made an error in his calculations…..
magenta_placenta on
Musk is talking about Starship, not “all possible spacecraft ever built.”
Different spacecraft = different mass = different propulsion = different mission architecture.
Starship’s mass is enormous compared to Apollo. A simple analogy:
* Apollo was like a custom-built drag racer: light, disposable, terrifying and fast.
* Starship is like a cargo airplane: reusable, heavy, safe and refuelable.
Both can cross the same distance. One just does it very differently.
No_Ground2618 on
The Apollo missions Saturn V wasn’t designed to be efficient and sustainable, it also wasn’t very practical.
Starship is designed to be reusable, efficient and sustainable. Starship is also heavier and larger than saturn while also being way more practical
ArmorKing999 on
The difference is: NASA hired highly skilled engineers. The dude in the video is a Youtuber. Just a person talking about stuff they know nothing about.
LougieHowser on
CAN WE JUST FUCKING COME OUT WITH THE ANIT GRAVITY PROPULSION ALREADY FFS, OR IS IT ONLY CHINA THAT HAS IT??? seriously what the fuck, we all know its a thing.
Plane-Scratch-6694 on
In a sub about conspiracies, there sure are a lot of moon truthers.
Individual-Drawer440 on
Ain’t nobody going to the moon.
SwitPosting on
I wasn’t aware he could fly
OpenImagination9 on
He’s looking at the problem incorrectly, let the engineers figure it out.
Longjumping-Box5691 on
Is that with or without a golf cart to drive around the moon on?
14 Comments
https://www.facebook.com/100089537454770/videos/1750660145821331/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
Perhaps they didn’t use the SpaceX Starship for the Apollo missions.
Sounds like earth orbit rendezvous
To clarify the space is fake argument, we live in a **simulated reality**: *The sun is* [*virtual in nature*](https://www.youtube.com/clip/Ugkxxah-f2WG4e5XqUP9E7Q4EcjYcmXmVq1d)*. In this framework, the luminaries are rendered uniquely for each observer, similar to wearing* [*augmented reality glasses*](https://www.youtube.com/clip/Ugkx6vxL1_dO6kqPpr_D5w8WbHHVUvK9wuZJ?si=0GEIuUWNmbxo6wmI)*. The sun rises & sets into the ground as specified in the* [*book of Enoch*](https://www.youtube.com/clip/UgkxX2Q8H3zRAmhTv1U3xPE8kUjpn5tXbcRE?si=qNC8LEYZnv_3LlLI)*. Heliocentrism is*[ irrational](https://www.youtube.com/clip/UgkxH2qJwD2-MdchSdv9gBOgTX3jRpRcySJ1?si=Eq9TYYkwJ34Mcl-k) *in 3d* [modelling](https://www.youtube.com/clip/UgkxG9f1zdQrcN-VbW6pijIHhjQFt39V2uwb)*. Space exploration fails the test of* [*repeatability*](https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxcXgd57i4cEkdkZhF7UIrYRXf6gyVVPp_?si=qjC9zDpKG3x2cV5i)*.*
Both Blue Origin and “Starship” need multiple in-orbit refueling to get to the moon.
“Boil-off” with the orbiting fuel tanker is the issue and the fuel needs to be vented off into space.
That is of course, if Starship can get to orbit and then get to orbit with a payload of fuel and then dock and transfer that fuel to an orbiting tanker.
These would all be significant “firsts” for space travel and have yet to be achieved.
Here is a great link that explains just how unnecessarily complicated the Artemis III mission is compared to the Apollo missions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoJsPvmFixU
Of course, The Nazi rocket scientist and Apollo Moon Mission chief Von Braun said that they would need a Rocketship the size of the Empire State building to get to the moon but he must have made an error in his calculations…..
Musk is talking about Starship, not “all possible spacecraft ever built.”
Different spacecraft = different mass = different propulsion = different mission architecture.
Starship’s mass is enormous compared to Apollo. A simple analogy:
* Apollo was like a custom-built drag racer: light, disposable, terrifying and fast.
* Starship is like a cargo airplane: reusable, heavy, safe and refuelable.
Both can cross the same distance. One just does it very differently.
The Apollo missions Saturn V wasn’t designed to be efficient and sustainable, it also wasn’t very practical.
Starship is designed to be reusable, efficient and sustainable. Starship is also heavier and larger than saturn while also being way more practical
The difference is: NASA hired highly skilled engineers. The dude in the video is a Youtuber. Just a person talking about stuff they know nothing about.
CAN WE JUST FUCKING COME OUT WITH THE ANIT GRAVITY PROPULSION ALREADY FFS, OR IS IT ONLY CHINA THAT HAS IT??? seriously what the fuck, we all know its a thing.
In a sub about conspiracies, there sure are a lot of moon truthers.
Ain’t nobody going to the moon.
I wasn’t aware he could fly
He’s looking at the problem incorrectly, let the engineers figure it out.
Is that with or without a golf cart to drive around the moon on?