People have noticed what appears to be a photograph of a young woman being sexually assaulted by a man?

Of course the liberal circles think he showed this in purpose to confirm he is part of the Epstein's cabal & no one can do anything about them.

I thought if any of you guys knew more about it, another cheeky member of the Cabal? If so isn't it a bit much even though they're all probably untouchable?

Posted by Saint_Poolan

7 Comments

  1. ijustlovebobbybones on

    Omgggggg my dense ass…this whole time I was looking at the butterflies…like mk ultra, project monarch. 🫪

  2. JesusSamuraiLapdance on

    I mean, having paintings like this is a bit pervy, but there’s nothing to imply that what’s happening in the painting is non-consensual.

    Would I be shocked if he was involved? No.

    Is this evidence he’s involved? Also no.

    Look at Tony Podesta’s art collection. That guy gives off far worse red flags.

    EDIT: although, the other comment pointing out the Project Monarch butterflies makes me wonder..

  3. Potential-Reach-3369 on

    I’ve always wanted to be apart of conversation, especially in this sub, but sadly I dont see this one. One user made me believe this was all connected to something. If anything its a distraction.
    2 cents out

  4. I’m pretty sure he talks about it in a video but I’m far to lazy to look for it

Leave A Reply