youtube.com/watch?v=0XamrfjhF8o
Watch the whole 2 minute video but especially at the :44 mark where reporter Joe Little says NO plane was there. This was on 9/11 well before Loose Change and well before anyone questioned what was going on as a conspiracy! He's just a regular reporter who's only reporting what he sees. Why would a reporter who arrived there within 30 minutes say no plane was there…unless it wasn't?!
Why say there were pieces of metal no bigger than a briefcase…what makes a plane that should've been there NOT be there and why is it the crash site doesn't look like a plane?
Has anyone thought about Flight 93 actually should be in people's memories MORE than the image of the Twin Towers being hit by planes that's embedded in everyone's minds who were alive back then? Know why? Think about it: You have a plane that, if it were there, could be CONTINOUSLY filmed. It's not going anywhere! Shouldn't there be TONS of images and video of firefighters, coroners, ambulances, police to help not only in finding any possible survivors but to atleast get bodies out before they're badly burned and can't be identified by families? Shouldn't there be a plane firefighters would have to put out before it reaches the nearby forest and triggers a forest fire?
Why no bodies to be recovered? NO plane to be seen? NO magazine covers of Flight 93 surrounded by ambulances, fire trucks, police trucks, rescue squads on the cover of PEOPLE, TIME, or NEWSWEEK that could RIVAL the images of a plane striking the Towers? Why was Flight 93 and the Pentagon (Flight 77) kept IN THE BACKGROUND during the 9/11 era? I've given you the answer!
Posted by SoggyCar6020
10 Comments
Yea always found it faulty not seeing any plane parts, or even plane shrapnel. I mean in New York they at least had an engine and a landing gear. 🤔
The phone calls of the passengers were quite off as well.
Absolutely, there would be SOMETHING left over, not just a glide bomb looking crater that looks much more like exploded ordnance than a crash site
The craziest part is they built a huge museum in Shanksville with taxpayer dollars in honor of this farce. They’ll go to any lengths to sell lies.
Yeah. This one blows my mind that no one questions this more. It was a while back, and my memory is old and hig, but there was passenger plane shot down over europe, i think by the russians? Anyway. I remember the crash site and there was literally the entire plane, broken into pieces obviously, but seats, and cases and people still in seats. And yet here, we have nothing but a couple of burnt out engines tossed into the woods. And trying to say that split in the ground was the wings haha like wtf are we in cartoon land. But americans believe that shit hard. I’ve seen photos before the crash of the earth already looking like that. So yeah. Couldn’t agree more in this
If it was shot down with a missile, like Rumsfeld accidentally said once, would that have obliterated the wreckage to this extent?
There was a video out breaking down how a very specific missile used by the us military made the same exact scar shown in the 3rd pic.
I saved a newspaper from 9/12 quoting the coroner who said there was nothing bigger than a phone book on siteÂ
Were is that plane?
Except they did find plane parts, including engine and fuselage parts.