100% a signal clear direction towards shooter too many coincidences
MrMojoRisin2THREE on
Why the fuck would a sniper need someone to stand next to the target giving hand signals ? Do you have any critical thinking skills? How would that possibly assist a sniper in any way.
IllustriousFile6404 on
We need more on these guys for sure
Jgunner44 on
Hollywood director
cjweisman on
That is pretty weird
AdLonely7631 on
Guys, the man in black has been Charlie’s head of security for years.
Wylie-Burp on
This is a stretch. The guy wasn’t trying to steal second and hand signals aren’t needed in any way for what transpired. For fuck sake, even if you want to force the narrative with the first guy, the second dude literally adjusted his shirt sleeve lol.
D12aperX on
Look at what side of the fence they’re on, those are his own people
TheWorldsStage on
Such a reach
ezhammer on
One guy dressed in white, one dressed in black. In case the shooter could not see one of them based on if they were against a light or dark colored background?
Exeltv0406 on
In the video of the actual assassination, this man can be seen a few feet to the left of Kirk and signals yet again right as someone in the crowd asks a question about mass shootings. Then the shot rings off.
I’m skeptical. I touch my hat and face a lot, and the guy in black has been with Kirk forever. Though I suppose it wouldn’t be the first time someone was bribed/blackmailed to turn against the person they were supposed to protect.
I think the question I’d ask here is why was a signal needed? A professional would likely be using an earpiece with a handler if they were waiting for a specific moment to strike, no?
CryptidToothbrush on
Nobody is going to stand that close to a target being shot from at least 200 yards away. That’s ridiculous.
Exeltv0406 on
This post depicts 2 men standing behind Charlie Kirk using secret hand signals before the tragic event. @ Mods
14 Comments
100% a signal clear direction towards shooter too many coincidences
Why the fuck would a sniper need someone to stand next to the target giving hand signals ? Do you have any critical thinking skills? How would that possibly assist a sniper in any way.
We need more on these guys for sure
Hollywood director
That is pretty weird
Guys, the man in black has been Charlie’s head of security for years.
This is a stretch. The guy wasn’t trying to steal second and hand signals aren’t needed in any way for what transpired. For fuck sake, even if you want to force the narrative with the first guy, the second dude literally adjusted his shirt sleeve lol.
Look at what side of the fence they’re on, those are his own people
Such a reach
One guy dressed in white, one dressed in black. In case the shooter could not see one of them based on if they were against a light or dark colored background?
In the video of the actual assassination, this man can be seen a few feet to the left of Kirk and signals yet again right as someone in the crowd asks a question about mass shootings. Then the shot rings off.
Video Source:
[https://www.foxnews.com/us/video-shows-moments-before-assassination-turning-point-usa-founder-charlie-kirk](https://www.foxnews.com/us/video-shows-moments-before-assassination-turning-point-usa-founder-charlie-kirk)
I’m skeptical. I touch my hat and face a lot, and the guy in black has been with Kirk forever. Though I suppose it wouldn’t be the first time someone was bribed/blackmailed to turn against the person they were supposed to protect.
I think the question I’d ask here is why was a signal needed? A professional would likely be using an earpiece with a handler if they were waiting for a specific moment to strike, no?
Nobody is going to stand that close to a target being shot from at least 200 yards away. That’s ridiculous.
This post depicts 2 men standing behind Charlie Kirk using secret hand signals before the tragic event. @ Mods