Let's be completely serious for a minute. In the world of international relations and military strategy, we are currently at a critical point where large-scale intercontinental nuclear exchange is a real possibility. It's pants shitting time for serious analysts. Drugstores near the Pentagon need to be added to the Pizza watch list because they'll be sending the interns to buy diapers and Excedrin.

In the art of war Sun Tzu warns, "It's fatal to back your enemy against a wall." Enemies take risks when they're desperate. We have an irrational actor (United States is acting against its interest) backed into a wall by Iran with the strait of Hormuz. Both Iran and America face existential risks from this conflict. Iran wants to survive. The United States loses its ability to project power and the petrodollar dies. We're not credible in diplomacy, credible threat of force fails.

A lot of billionaires are in the US, their money ostensibly depends on the global economic machine continuing to function. The coming global depression should have billionaires losing their shit. Yes, at the very top the wealth and power held by a given single idiot is basically unlimited, but there are still very wealthy people who'd be trying to have a say in the matter. Not a peep. Petrodollar tanks, that's a big loss for someone with less than 10 billion. Oil money ain't shit if people can't take deliveries. So much money is parked in dollars because they've been the most stable. You'd think they'd be buying out politicians and influencers to save the global economy. At least the centimillionaires. Crickets.

And at that point, wealth isn't about money it's about power and influence. If a country gets destroyed by climate change, takes a major strategic loss, etc. The resident billionaires and multimillionaires lose influence. To a certain extent they benefit from chaos, and they've certainly got no loyalty to any nation…but they should still have an interest in maintaining the state apparatus they've purchased, especially for hard power. You can't coup who you want if the US military can't deal with some missiles and cheapo drones. And if things spiral out of control they could have a real problem. The proles may use use the French solution.

The billionaires should be freaking the fuck out. And they're not. They should be freaking out about long term problems too. They're not. Why aren't they freaking out? Why are they having so many kids who might end up marrying plebs (can't control 20+ kids)? Why was Epstein trying to create the perfect baby? Are we really straight back to regular old eugenics? Does it make sense to dump kids onto a planet that'll become hell? Or is something else going on?

Peter Thiel just got a mansion in Argentina, which would be one of the safest countries in the event of a nuclear exchange. The billionaires have plenty of bunkers in New Zealand, also safe. Nobody's freaking out despite there being a real threat of nuclear exchange. Only one person has to make one mistake to start off a chain reaction that kills most humans. Canada has restricted US military use of its airspace and Carney's making strategic plans with intentions clearly beyond Canada's current place in the world order. Canada's only going to suffer minimal damage.

Because mass depopulation by nuclear exchange is in *their* interest. Carbon emissions snuffed out. Large scale, sudden rewilding. The climate will stabilize. Yeah, humans won't be able to live in a lot of places but it kind of doesn't matter. AI replaces a lot of plebs, especially devaluing the smart ones who ask too many questions. You don't need so many people anymore. And their descendants will dominate the population of our entire species. A hostile takeover of the human race. Canada as a final reserve of genetic diversity, plus it's fucking cold so the rich don't want to stay there year round.

We know how much they hate regular people. Gaza was just an experiment. Now they know it's too messy to take the population down a few million at a time. People make a big fuss about stuff like bombing hospitals, shooting kids for sport, mass starvation, whatever.

And the only countries resisting the genocide in Gaza and Israels war on Iran? Civilization states which have overthrown existing governments through popular revolutions. Civilization means being part of something bigger. The ones who want humanity to still exist.

When ads-b data shows lots of private planes suddenly headed to Chile, NZ, Argentina… we're all done for. And it was planned.

Posted by usedsanitarypad

8 Comments

  1. India safest area?

    Pakistan will nuke the fuck out of India in case of full out nuclear world war.

    Nordics will also get nuked. Why? NATO bases. and they are pursuing to get their own Nukes (i.e Sweden)

    Middle east will get hit hard like Europe. Nothing in israel they have nukes, they will also get hit. Turkey have NATO stationed Nukes they will get hit.

    etc etc

  2. Billionaires just want to consoom. That’s the main motivation behind everything that they do. They aren’t freaking out because their men are in the White House, Kremlin and every other place of power and they have never been able to consoom more and harder than now.
    So why would they freak out? They’re having the time of their life.

    As if Putin, Trump and Co are gonna drop nukes. Can’t have sex with children if you end the world anymore now can you.

  3. There wont be safe areas, thats just based on known tech missile range and is not considering winds, fallout, ecosystem impact, etc.
    Yeah not everyone will be hit by a nuke but 99.9% will die and humans will be border extintion once again.

  4. Interesting-Wheel381 on

    Sería bueno empezar a construir un bunker. Con todas las catástrofes naturales que nada tienen de naturales diría artificiales. No les conviene acabar con toda la humanidad con armas nucleares

  5. BestOrNothing on

    What is the source of this map and why does Poland have significantly larger “nuclear wasteland” area than any other place in the world?

  6. splashDMGzero on

    no one is nuking anyone else hollywood disaster movie mushroom cloud-style. it’s much more efficient to just starve people then take the land when they’re gone.

    if you realllly want to make them mad, don’t starve. theil, gates, musk & klaus will be fuming in their bunkers about how they cut off the oil, blocked out the sun, vax’d the unknowing, unleashed the bots, disappeared cash and the plebs still wouldn’t die off.

  7. Because nuclear exchange was a bigger possibility 60 years ago. Now the possibility is very small.

Leave A Reply