https://youtu.be/tx8Z9fxxw-U?is=nOPRpKsnUQNT0Eds
(Watch this video)
For the years was passed, I'm more convinced that MJ was a scapegoat for the real pedos in Hollywood and america in general. He was found not guilty in tribunal, not even the FBI found him guilty. Let's the facts:
– They don't found his fingerprints the that "book with children" in his house.
– Neverland had a lot of cameras, he don't show any porno magazine for none of them.
– All this computers and midia was analised by police.
– They even took photos of him naked but the the accounts did not match with what the testimoty described this penis.
– Evan Chandler, k*ll himself after Michael was found innocent.
We have know the true pedos bein showing in the media: the Epstein files. But no one is being arrested, they even put the entire file in copies in new York and I hope something happens, people read it and open they eyes.
The're so much worse in this hole of Epstein.
Posted by Codenomesailorv
2 Comments
I believe in Michael Jackson’s innocence but I really think that baseless arguments that are in defence of him ultimately hurts the cause
A few corrections.
The video being cited is the Pellicano tape, and even CBS later retracted key parts of that story. Building an argument around a source that was publicly challenged and partially retracted isn’t a great starting point.
“Not guilty” is also not the same thing as “innocent.” The 2005 verdict only addressed the specific charges in the Arvizo case. It did not rule on Jordan Chandler’s allegations, Jason Francia’s allegations, Wade Robson’s allegations, James Safechuck’s allegations, or any later claims.
The FBI point is misleading as well. The FBI did not conduct a 13-year independent child molestation investigation that “cleared” Michael Jackson. The FBI’s own records show they mainly provided assistance to local law enforcement when requested.
Regarding the books, the issue was never fingerprints. The defense did not dispute possession. One of the books even contained a handwritten inscription from Michael Jackson. The books were discussed extensively during the 2005 trial because prosecutors believed they were relevant to intent.
As for the genital description, the claim that the description “did not match” is exactly where the problem begins. Fans repeat that constantly, yet when asked for a primary source showing Jordan Chandler said Michael Jackson was circumcised, none is ever produced. Meanwhile, people directly involved in the case, including Lauren Weis and Bill Dworin, have repeatedly stated that the description was a match.
Evan Chandler’s death years later is not evidence that Michael Jackson was innocent, just as a witness dying does not retroactively invalidate their earlier statements.
Finally, the idea that Michael Jackson was a “scapegoat” for other abusers in Hollywood doesn’t actually address the evidence in his own cases. Jeffrey Epstein existing does not explain away bed-sharing with unrelated children, settlements, witness testimony, seized materials, or the allegations themselves.
Other predators existing does not make allegations against Michael Jackson disappear. Each case stands or falls on its own evidence.