*The New York Times* doesn’t even try to be anything other than partisan yellow journalism anymore.
Some of the *Times*’ content almost sounds like it is little more than propaganda that was funded by the CCP or now-deceased Ayatollah’s hardline regime. Just this week, they published a “news” article (more of a left-wing op-ed) that mockingly claimed how China doesn’t need anything from President Trump or the US.
During college and grad school, I read *The New York Times* cover-to-cover every single day. This was because it was provided by my college and university dormitories. Even then, I understood just how biased it was. I would never have subscribed.
I would love to find out just how many people truly subscribe to the *NY Times* versus how many “subscriptions” are paid for by colleges, universities, non-profits and corporations. My guess is that the actual “real” subscription (i.e., subscriptions from individuals) is much, much, much lower.
1 Comment
*The New York Times* doesn’t even try to be anything other than partisan yellow journalism anymore.
Some of the *Times*’ content almost sounds like it is little more than propaganda that was funded by the CCP or now-deceased Ayatollah’s hardline regime. Just this week, they published a “news” article (more of a left-wing op-ed) that mockingly claimed how China doesn’t need anything from President Trump or the US.
During college and grad school, I read *The New York Times* cover-to-cover every single day. This was because it was provided by my college and university dormitories. Even then, I understood just how biased it was. I would never have subscribed.
I would love to find out just how many people truly subscribe to the *NY Times* versus how many “subscriptions” are paid for by colleges, universities, non-profits and corporations. My guess is that the actual “real” subscription (i.e., subscriptions from individuals) is much, much, much lower.